Entyrix Alternative
An honest comparison for teams weighing Entyrix against Prometiam for EU + UK company data, KYB, and sanctions screening. Entyrix and Prometiam are near-identically positioned: both are modern REST APIs over official European registries with a free tier. The main difference is maturity — Entyrix advertises broader country breadth (14+ live markets) but is still pre-commercial with paid tiers not yet shipped and pricing unpublished, while Prometiam has committed, transparent public pricing, live sanctions plus US export-control screening, and real UK PSC beneficial-ownership data today.
Why teams look at both
Both target the same buyer: developers who want registry data and KYB signal behind one bearer-token REST call, without an enterprise procurement cycle. If you are choosing between them, the decision usually comes down to how much you value published pricing and shipped compliance features now versus wider country coverage that is still filling in.
What Prometiam covers
One schema over official registries — Spain (BORME), France (BODACC), and the UK (Companies House, including 12.3M PSC beneficial owners), with Ireland (CRO) and Poland (KRS) at company level only. Daily updates, corporate-event timelines (ES + FR), and sanctions plus US export-control screening across six sources (EU, UN, OFAC, UK OFSI, French gels, and the US Consolidated Screening List) covering 44,000-plus active entities. No PEP, no adverse-media, and no credit score.
Honest trade-offs
- Prometiam: committed public pricing (€0 / €9.99 / €29.99 / custom), free tier no card, live sanctions + US export-control screening, real UK PSC ownership, EU residency (Frankfurt). Narrower country list.
- Entyrix: broader advertised country breadth and UBO across more markets, but pre-commercial — paid tiers and pricing are not yet published, so cost and long-term SLA are unknown. If breadth matters more than commercial certainty, evaluate Entyrix.
Read more · Get a free API key