Comparison · Entyrix

Entyrix Alternative

An honest comparison of two closely-matched EU company-data APIs. Entyrix and Prometiam target the same developer buyer — the difference is commercial maturity, not category.

TL;DR

Entyrix is a modern, well-built REST API over European registries with a generous free tier and broad advertised country coverage — but it is pre-commercial: paid tiers are announced for later in 2026 and pricing is not yet published, so cost, contract terms, and long-term SLA are unknown today. Prometiam is the shipped, commercially-committed option for multi-country KYB: published pricing from €9.99/month, live sanctions plus US export-control screening (beta) across seven sources, and real UK PSC beneficial-ownership data now. If you value certainty and compliance features that exist today, Prometiam. If you value the widest country list and can accept pre-commercial risk, Entyrix is a fair look.

Why teams compare Entyrix and Prometiam

1. Same shape. Both are one-bearer-token REST APIs over official EU registries with free access to start (Prometiam's is a 14-day trial), OpenAPI spec, and copy-paste curl — a genuinely close match on developer experience.
2. Pricing certainty. Entyrix has not published paid pricing yet. For teams that need to budget and commit, an unpublished future price is a real evaluation risk.
3. Compliance features now. If your use case needs sanctions screening and beneficial-ownership data in production this quarter, what ships today matters more than a roadmap.
4. Country footprint. If your portfolio spans Baltics, the rest of the Nordics, or Central Europe beyond the registries Prometiam covers, Entyrix's broader advertised coverage is a genuine draw.

Prometiam in one paragraph

Prometiam is a REST API that unifies official company-registry data across Europe under one schema, with daily updates, sanctions (beta) and US export-control screening (EU + UN + OFAC + UK + Australia (DFAT) + FR gels, plus the US Consolidated Screening List), corporate-event timelines (ES + FR + GB), and ongoing monitoring webhooks. Officers are served for Spain, France, the United Kingdom (including UK PSC beneficial owners), Norway, Poland and the Czech Republic (Polish natural persons are masked by the register itself; Czech natural persons are the name and the month and year of birth only); Ireland, Finland, Sweden, Croatia, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Slovakia, Switzerland, Latvia, Cyprus, Romania, Lithuania, Canada, Australia, Japan, Israel, Singapore, Colombia, Taiwan, Brazil and the United States are company records only. Pricing is public from €9.99/month, 14-day free trial card required, nothing charged for 14 days, EU data residency in Frankfurt.

Entyrix vs Prometiam — at a glance

Pricing

Entyrix is currently free across the board and advertises a Free → Pro → Enterprise model with paid tiers arriving later in 2026. That is attractive for experimentation, but it means the eventual price of the tier you'd depend on is unknown, and there's no published contract or SLA to plan around yet.

Prometiam publishes its pricing today:

• Starter trial — 14 days, 500 credits, card required, nothing charged for 14 days.
• Starter — €9.99/mo, 60 rpm and 1,000 credits/month.
• Professional — €29.99/mo, 120 rpm and 10,000 credits/month, full sanctions screening included.
• Scale — €99.99/mo for higher volume.
• Enterprise — custom, for high-volume or custom SLA needs.

If your evaluation needs a number you can commit to and defend to finance, Prometiam gives you one now. If you're prototyping and price isn't yet a factor, Entyrix's free tier is a reasonable place to test coverage.

Coverage and freshness

This is where Entyrix's pitch is strongest. It advertises more live markets than Prometiam — the Baltics, parts of Central Europe, the Nordics, and more — with a stated EU-27 target. If your counterparties sit outside the registries Prometiam covers, that breadth is a real advantage worth testing.

Prometiam is deliberately narrower and deeper on its live set: Spain, France, the UK, Norway and Poland with directors and daily updates from official registries and gazettes, plus Ireland, Finland, Sweden, Croatia, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Slovakia, Switzerland, Latvia, Cyprus, Romania, Lithuania, Canada, Australia, Japan, Israel, Singapore, Colombia, Taiwan, Brazil and the United States at company level. Where the two overlap — especially the UK, where Prometiam exposes PSC beneficial owners — the depth is strong. When you evaluate either vendor, spot-check the actual field depth per country, not just the country count; both approaches leave some markets thinner than the headline suggests.

API and integration

Both are genuinely API-first: bearer token, single base URL, structured JSON, OpenAPI spec, and a working curl in under a minute. On raw developer experience this comparison is close to a tie — a refreshing change from the enterprise incumbents. Prometiam adds cursor pagination, predictable per-tier rate limits, an in-page interactive doc at /risk-api/docs, and a published MCP server for agent workflows.

The practical difference is what backs the API. Prometiam's endpoints, rate limits, and sanctions coverage are contractually part of a paid product with real customers; Entyrix's are part of a pre-commercial platform still defining its tiers. Same code shape, different guarantees.

Sanctions and compliance features

Both advertise sanctions screening. Prometiam's is live (beta) and specific: EU consolidated + UN + OFAC + UK + Australia (DFAT) + French gels, plus the US Consolidated Screening List (BIS Entity List, Denied Persons, ITAR) — seven sources, daily refresh, trigram fuzzy matching, confidence scores, and watchlist webhooks (from Starter); full screening is included on the €29.99 Professional tier. That US export-control layer is unusual among EU-focused APIs.

Entyrix advertises OFAC / EU / UN / UK screening plus UBO, credit scoring, and NIS2/shell-address signals. Some of these go beyond Prometiam's honest scope — Prometiam claims PEP only as a beta, Spain-only set with no relatives or close associates, and deliberately does not claim adverse-media, a credit score, or UBO outside UK PSC, because the underlying data isn't redistributable for the other markets. If you need those signals, verify Entyrix's source and legal basis per country before relying on them; if you want a vendor that only claims what it can stand behind, that's Prometiam's deliberate posture.

Who should choose Entyrix

Pick Entyrix if:

• Your portfolio spans EU markets beyond the registries Prometiam covers — Baltics, the rest of the Nordics, Central Europe — and breadth is your top priority
• You're prototyping and current price (€0) matters more than a committed future price
• You want UBO or credit-score signals across more markets and are willing to verify the source and legal basis yourself
• You're comfortable building on a pre-commercial platform whose paid tiers and SLA are still to come

Who should choose Prometiam

Pick Prometiam if:

• Your core footprint is inside the registries Prometiam covers and you want depth there — including real UK PSC beneficial ownership
• You need committed, published pricing you can budget and defend today
• Sanctions plus US export-control screening must be live in production now, not on a roadmap
• You want a vendor that only claims what it can stand behind — PEP stated as beta and Spain-only, no adverse-media or UBO overreach
• You're a fintech, lender, factoring company, or compliance-tech vendor that needs commercial certainty and EU data residency

Trying both

1. Sign up free at prometiam.com/signup — nothing charged for 14 days. You'll get an rk_live_* key in your inbox.
2. Pick 100 counterparties from your real pipeline — ideally spanning ES/FR/GB and any wider markets you care about — and query both APIs.
3. Diff the fields you actually use. Compare registry depth, director/PSC data on the UK set, and corporate-event history. Country count is marketing; field depth is what you integrate against.
4. Screen the same names — call Prometiam's /sanctions/screen?name=…&threshold=80 and Entyrix's equivalent; compare match counts and source attribution.
5. Weigh certainty vs breadth. Decide whether committed pricing and shipped compliance (Prometiam) or wider advertised coverage on a pre-commercial platform (Entyrix) fits your risk tolerance.

Beyond the registry record

Two derived signals, neither of them a rating. Both are dated facts carrying the source they came from, so whoever reviews your file can check them.

• Companies that stopped filing. A company that quietly stops trading rarely dissolves; the register notices first. The registry_compliance flag returns that state in one shape for Spain (provisional closure of the registry sheet), the United Kingdom (a strike-off proposal, or annual accounts overdue), Ireland (the strike-off list) and Norway (compulsory liquidation). Read it on GET /companies/{id}?include=risk_flags, or list those companies with risk_flag_type=registry_compliance. It is a compliance signal, not an insolvency: read it together with status.
• Public contracts, and the buyer behind them. GET /procurement/awards returns public-contract awards from Spain, France, the UK, Ireland, Poland and Norway by supplier, buyer, identifier, CPV code and date, linked to the supplier’s registry record where the identifier resolves. GET /procurement/buyer/{id} scores the contracting body itself: the probability that its next award draws a single bid, and the probability that a supplier it awards to enters insolvency within two years.

Both are ordinary REST calls on the published price and included in the 14-day trial. Procurement awards cover Spain, France, the UK, Ireland, Poland and Norway (Ireland, Poland and Norway above the EU thresholds only), the buyer scores are Spain and France and in beta, and a score is a prompt to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.

FAQ

How is Prometiam different from Entyrix?
Both are modern REST APIs over official EU registries that you can try free (Prometiam offers a 14-day trial). The key difference is maturity: Prometiam has committed, published pricing, live sanctions + US export-control screening, and real UK PSC ownership data today. Entyrix advertises broader country coverage but is pre-commercial — paid tiers and pricing aren't published yet.

Does Entyrix cover more countries than Prometiam?
Yes, by advertised count — Entyrix lists 14+ live markets targeting EU-27, versus Prometiam's live set (ES, FR, GB, NO, PL with officers, plus IE, PL, FI, SE, HR, BE at company level). If raw breadth is your priority, Entyrix currently claims more.

What does Entyrix cost?
As of mid-2026 it's free and pre-commercial, with paid tiers announced for later in 2026 but pricing unpublished. Prometiam publishes its pricing now: €9.99 / €29.99 / €99.99 / custom.

Which is better for sanctions screening?
Prometiam's is live (beta) and broad — seven sources including the US Consolidated Screening List, daily refresh, confidence scores, and webhooks, with full screening on the €29.99 tier. Entyrix advertises OFAC/EU/UN/UK screening.

Does Prometiam offer UBO data?
Real UK PSC beneficial ownership — yes. It does not claim UBO outside the UK, because the other registries don't make it redistributable. Entyrix advertises UBO across more markets; verify the source per country.

Is Prometiam GDPR-compliant?
Yes. Data is hosted in the EU (Frankfurt). Officer data is processed under GDPR Article 6(1)(c) and 6(1)(f).

See other comparisons

• Creditsafe alternative
• Pappers alternative
• Einforma alternative
• Companies House API alternative